Truly Devious by Maureen Johnson: What You Need to Know
Truly Devious by Maureen Johnson: What You Need to Know contains a Summary of Truly Devious, What I Liked (and Didn’t) about Truly Devious, and spoilers for the ending, which is a bit of a cliffhanger!

Truly Devious by Maureen Johnson: What You Need to Know
- Published on January 16, 2018 by Harper Teen
- Age range: 12 and up
- Genre: contemporary mystery and historical mystery
- The book is also a Boarding School Mystery
- I received an eARC from the publisher via Netgalley
- This review was syndicated from Jen Ryland Reviews
Summary of Truly Devious

Albert Ellingham, an early twentieth century tycoon, founded the Ellingham Academy a famous private boarding school.
Shortly after the school opened in the 1930s, someone kidnapped Ellingham’s wife and daughter. The only real clue to the identity of the person responsible was a mocking riddle signed with the frightening pseudonym “Truly, Devious.” It became one of the great unsolved crimes of American history.
True-crime aficionado Stevie Bell is set to begin her first year at Ellingham Academy as a girl with a plan: to solve this cold case.
But Truly, Devious makes a surprise return, and death revisits Ellingham Academy. The past has crawled out of its grave. Someone got away with murder.
Review of Truly, Devious

I’ve read all Maureen Johnson’s books, most recently the first two books in her Shades of London series. And that is why I can say that while I enjoyed some aspects of Truly, Devious, I’m also a little torn and nervous about reading further.
To me, this book has a very similar vibe to The Name of the Star, the first book in the Shades of London series.
In my Goodreads review of The Name of the Star, I wrote: “To enjoy this book, you have to slow down and enjoy the journey: the quirky details about London, the boarding school stuff, and Rory’s humorous asides about her eccentric relatives in the South.”
- Truly, Devious also moves at a leisurely pace, touring you around the Ellingham Academy along with main character Stevie in lots of detail.
- Like Rory, Stevie spends lots of time obsessing about her parents who, to her horror, volunteer for a conservative politician she abhors.
- Both books feature a large and quirky cast of students and adults.
- Both books involve crimes in both the present and the past (Jack the Ripper in the Shades series and the 1936 kidnapping of the Ellingham Academy benefactor’s wife Iris and three year old daughter Alice and then the murder of a student in Truly, Devious.)
I thought this worked well in both books. In Truly, Devious, the narrative actually switches between the past and present.
I actually felt a lot more invested in the 1936 mystery than in the present day one (won’t say what the present one is for spoiler protection purposes.)
While the 1936 kidnapping story is told in a straightforward way, the present day crime gets a little … muddled.
I don’t think it’s a spoiler to say that I’m not sure if I’m supposed to think that the same evil force continues to commit crimes 82 years later, that the (now 79 year old) missing Alice Ellingham is alive and a homicidal maniac, that the mansion is haunted/cursed, or … what.
Pretty much anything is possible (and I say that as a compliment to the author!)
Now, let’s get to the worrisome parts of both series for me: the plotting and the romances.
Those were the aspects of the Shades of London books that ultimately made me pause my reading of the series. (I read the first two books but am waiting until the series is finished to decide if I’m continuing.)
The romance situation got extremely messy, and some of the plot twists were really out-there and took things in directions I wasn’t entirely on board with.
The romance in Truly, Devious was …. interesting.
Stevie is a somewhat awkward character, which I appreciated. She’s obsessed with true crime (and the Ellingham case in particular) and suffers from anxiety. Perhaps because of the anxiety, Stevie did read a little young to me.
Her love interest, to me, was odd and very off-putting. Was he supposed to be brooding and aloof? Not sure, but I didn’t understand his appeal. At all.
I read this book along with my friend Karen from For What It’s Worth Reviews and, while I will let her express her own feelings, I’ll just say that the romance was something we puzzled over a lot. While I wouldn’t mind a change in love interest, I’m hoping that the romance situation doesn’t get weird and complicated like it did in Shades.
Next, there’s a reveal at the end of Truly, Devious. I saw a couple people on Goodreads saying “whoa that ending!”
I guess my expectations went in a different direction, because when I got to that reveal I was like “huh.” (Not “huh?” but “huh.”) Perhaps because of my worry about future plot twists, I didn’t make me more excited to read on. It made me a bit more worried as to where things might be going.
Bottom line: I really do want to know who kidnapped poor Alice Ellingham, so I will check out reviews for the next book.
Have you read Shades of London or posted a review of Truly, Devious? Let me know your thoughts in comments.


Book three isn’t the last Shades of London book? That’s a pretty old series (I think I own one or two of the books). I liked the Truly Devious series. I was bit frustrated with the third book, but my Stevie-love was strong enough.
Yes, I think book three was the last one!
I read the series last year. I thought it was too slow. It definitely didn’t need to be 3 books. I think the story could have been told in 2 books. I liked the story but it dragged too much.
I read the first book and knew this series was not for me!